Show as: Mobile

Authoritarian leadership: Cases For and Against

Authoritarian Leadership

An authoritarian leadership style is when a leader manages strategies and techniques, chooses what objectives are to be accomplished, and coordinates and controls all exercises with no significant cooperation by the subordinates. This leader has full control of the group or team, leaving low independence inside of the group. Typically this type of leader has a strong personality, power over others and must have the capacity to viably persuade their group to complete the assignment. The group is relied upon to finish tasks under close supervision while almost boundless power is concentrated on the leader. Subordinates' reactions to the requests given are either accepted or rejected, with little room for discussion. They sometimes, yet not generally, give clear desires to what should be done, when it ought to be done, and how it ought to be finished.

This kind of authority goes back to the most punctual tribes and domains. It is regularly utilised as a part of the present day when there is no place for a lapse, for example, development organisations or assembling jobs. Authoritarian administration normally encourages little innovativeness in choice making. Many believe that it is harder to move from an authoritarian style to a traditional corporate management style than from an Administration based structure to an authoritarian type of initiative. Misuse of this style is normally seen as controlling, bossy and domineering. Authoritarian leadership is best connected to circumstances where there is little time for gathering discussion.

Benefits of Authoritarian leadership

Authoritarian leadership can be helpful in some instances, for example, when choices should be made rapidly without counselling with an expansive gathering of individuals. Additionally a few tasks require solid authority to get things fulfilled rapidly and proficiently. In a dictatorial workplace, the leader generally keeps a close watch on the employee's work. This takes out the propensity for specialists to "slack off", which may happen with more indulgent administration styles. The outcome can be expanded profitability and pace, as individuals who fall behind are immediately recognised and dealt with. Additionally, quality may enhance as a result of one's work always being closely scrutinised. Time squandering and the need to waste assets is likewise often diminished.

Drawbacks of Authoritarian Leadership

While autocratic authority can be useful on occasion, there are likewise numerous cases where this initiative style can be dangerous. Individuals who misuse an autocratic leadership style are frequently seen as bossy, controlling, and tyrannical, which can prompt discontent and even hatred among their staff. Since autocratic leaders settle on choices without counselling others, individuals in the community are likely to resent the fact that they are not able to contribute their thoughts and opinions. Analysts have additionally found that dictatorial administration regularly brings about an absence of innovative answers to different issues, which can cause projects to be poorly executed and, as a result, to lead to poor outcomes.

While the absolutist authoritarian style has some potential pitfalls, leaders and managers can benefit from figuring out how to utilise components of this style carefully. For instance, it can be used in cases where the person in charge has access to specialist or perhaps sensitive information, but requires manpower to get the job done. It can also be useful during times of change when a strong leadership personality and team cohesion is key to overcoming moments of uncertainty in an effective way.

Looking for professional training?

Tell us what kind of professional training you're searching for and we'll look through our over 17,000 course listings and personally get in touch with several UK training providers. They'll send you more information about the course including price, upcoming dates, and answers to any questions you might have.

This field is used for controlling automatic form submits. Please leave it blank:
Tell us what you're looking for:

This is a cost-free and obligation-free service.

Last updated: 30 Mar 2016

You might also be interested in:

Profiting on a Healthy Work Environment

Published: 03/11/2015

From healthcare schemes to the treadmill desk, the workplace environment is becoming increasingly health conscious and it could be beneficial to business financial health, not just the employees wellbeing. Over the years organisations have noted high employee turnover rates, absentees due to illness in addition to time off through exhaustion or other health related issues. How can making the workplace environment help an organisation's profitability?

Read more

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Internal Training

Published: 04/11/2015

Internal training enables professionals to receive training courses that tailors their expertise according to the unique necessities of their respective companies. Professionals do not have to leave their workplaces to receive this training. That saves both time and energy and the training is proven to be more efficient in that way as individuals receive hands-on experience relevant to their career profile. Before arranging internal or in-house training, companies should consider both positive and negative aspects in order to measure the extent of benefits one can receive through this type of training.